CAPITAL4 BLOG
FEATURED BLOGGERS
A fueling fable: Consumer protection issues with payments
posted by AJAY SHAH on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012
On 22nd December 2011, we purchased petrol worth Rs.100 from an Indian Oil fueling station in Bombay using an ICICI Bank debit card. The receipt suggested that we could have saved a fuel surcharge of 2.5% had we used an Indian Oil Citibank credit card. Upon seeing this message, we asked the cashier at the petrol pump if we would be charged 2.5% over and above the Rs.100 that we paid for the fuel. The cashier assured us that only Rs.100 would be debited from the account linked to the card. The chargeslip and the receipt were:
A couple of days later, we viewed the account statement online and found that the relevant transaction had been recorded. A full week later, we observed that an additional charge of Rs.11.03 had been debited from the account for the same vendor. Not only was the entry unusual, the charge did not match the 2.5% figure which was mentioned on the transaction receipt:
We wrote to the bank asking them to explain the transaction. The bank explained that for fuel purchased at non-HPCL petrol pumps, a surcharge of 2.5% of the fuel cost or Rs.10 (whichever is higher) would be levied. A service tax would be levied additionally.
There is a consumer protection issue here. After the account had been debited, and up until we sought a clarification from the bank, we were not made aware of the surcharge. The chargeslip gave a false impression of the amount being paid.
Upon delving further, we find various websites where people have complained about this surcharge being confusing. Further investigation revealed an interesting combination of participants:
The surcharge on fuel is mentioned in the fine print in Terms and Conditions of a debit card.
The bank that deploys the POS machine (acquiring bank being Citibank in our example), at the end of day, surcharges the higher of 2.5% or Rs.10 and sends it to the customer's bank (issuer bank being ICICI Bank in this case).
The issuing bank then creates a separate debit in the customer's account for the surcharge
The acquiring bank shares much of this surcharge back to Oil Marketing Company (Indian Oil in this example).
Contrast this with typical debit card processing fees in India around 1.5%. In most cases, merchants will inform a customer before surcharging, and the value on the chargeslip is what the customer pays.
Many banks apply these surcharges weeks or months after the transaction actually occurs, which helps ensure that most customers do not understand what is going on.
When paying for fuel in India with a debit card, the customer pays the surcharge by being misled, the Oil Marketing Company makes higher profits, the charge is administered in a non-transparent way, and is posted late when the customer may not even recall the transaction. Thus, Government owned companies and banks have created a perverse incentive, whereby customers prefer to use cash rather than pay electronically.
posted by AJAY SHAH on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012
Did you find offensive content or language? Report this blog
Archives
- May 2012 (27)
- April 2012 (65)
- March 2012 (60)
- February 2012 (62)
- January 2012 (71)
- December 2011 (70)
- November 2011 (78)
- October 2011 (61)
- September 2011 (76)
- August 2011 (122)
- July 2011 (191)
- June 2011 (195)
- May 2011 (168)
- April 2011 (130)
- March 2011 (208)
- February 2011 (52)
- January 2011 (66)
- December 2010 (80)
- November 2010 (55)
- October 2010 (48)
- September 2010 (11)
- August 2010 (9)
- July 2010 (11)
- June 2010 (15)
- May 2010 (19)
- April 2010 (12)
- March 2010 (24)
- February 2010 (20)
- January 2010 (21)
- December 2009 (18)
- November 2009 (39)
- October 2009 (13)
- September 2009 (25)
- August 2009 (22)
- July 2009 (28)
- June 2009 (18)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (7)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (9)
- January 2009 (8)
- December 2008 (5)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (8)
- September 2008 (1)
- (1)


